GO TO MARKET · by AskShiva

A production compiler for software.

Point it at a repository. It works out what production actually requires of that application, then reports exactly which of those requirements are unmet — each one with the file and line it was decided from.

Compile reads it once and gives you a passport you can send. Studio keeps the working copy open so you can read the source behind each finding, have a patch proposed, and watch the score move when it is applied.

Public repositories only. Nothing is ever executed, nothing is built, and none of your dependencies are installed. A Studio working copy is deleted a few hours after you stop using it.

Exported straight from Lovable, Bolt, v0, Cursor or Claude — whatever shape it is in.

Evidence, not opinion

Every verdict resolves from a boolean over signals, each carrying a file and line. No model gets a vote.

Says what it cannot see

Absence of the ability to look resolves to UNKNOWN, which is counted against the score rather than silently passed.

A passport you can send

One self-contained URL. Snippets are redacted by default — forwarding the result should not forward your source.

What this does not claim. It grades the checklist, not the software. Absence of a finding is not evidence of absence, and production readiness is finally a property of operations — whether the restore restores, whether the pager fires. These are necessary conditions, not sufficient ones.